5 May 2017 – The South African Football Association (SAFA) has sat and made pronouncements on some cases.
NORTH WEST ABC MOTSEPE
* In a matter between Buya Musuthu FC VS Polokwane City Rovers, the latter has been found guilty after their coach, while serving a red card suspension, participated in a match against Thaba Tshwane FC. Polokwane City Rovers had their match points expunged, and were fined a further 10-thousand rand, suspended for the rest of the season. Rovers has since referred the matter for Arbitration
* Rovers was again found guilty in a different matter, this after causing abandonment of a match against Phatsima All Stars FC. The game was declared a walkover with the points forfeited to Phatsima, and Rovers was fined R10-thousand rand payable within 14 days. The chairman of the club was also ordered to write an apology to SAFA within 10 days
* Junior Pirates has been found guilty after conceding three walk overs – the DC has recommended termination of participation in line with Rule 28.5 of the Rules of Regulations.
EASTERN CAPE ABC
* In the Eastern Cape, Future Tigers lodged a protest against City Lads whom they accused of playing an improperly registered player. Lads were found guilty and the points awarded to Future Tigers, and fined a further R10-thousand rand which is payable withing 14 days of sentencing
* In a different matter, Future Tigers lodged another protest – this time against Lion City where they alleged the latter improperly registered a player. The protest was dismissed and the protest fee of R10-thousand rand forfeited to SAFA.
In the National First Division, ROYAL EAGLES lodged an appeal on a Dispute Resolution Chamber sanction but lost the case against BELLOS (Appeal on DRC sanction)
It was found that:
* The decision of the DRC was correct and the appeal is dismissed
* Appellant to pay the costs of the appeal
* Appellant to forfeit appeal fee
* Appellant is advised of its right to take the matter for arbitration if it feels so.
In another matter Royals Eagles again lost their case when they appealed in a matter against player Dominic Isaacs.
It was also found that:
* The Appeal application fails
* The Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber should stand
* Costs are awarded against Appellants
* Appeal fee to be forfeited
* Appellant to pay costs of the seating as determined by SAFA.
This article was sourced from the SAFA website.